Peer Review Process and Publication Schedule
Our journal is committed to delivering high-quality scientific content and maintaining a regular publication schedule to stay current.
Peer Review Process: To enhance scientific quality and reliability, our journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. During this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential, ensuring unbiased evaluations. Reviewers are selected from experts relevant to the journal's scope. Additionally, authors receive guidance in preparing their papers and use valuable feedback from reviewers to enhance their articles.
Publication Schedule: Our journal is planned to be published twice a year. The first issue will be released in December, while the second one will be available in June. Specific submission deadlines for authors are predetermined for each issue. For information regarding the upcoming submission deadline for the first issue, please visit Publishing Schedule.
Stages of the Double-Blind Peer Review Process:
- Submission and Initial Assessment: Authors submit their prepared articles to the journal. Once submitted, the journal's editors review the relevance of the article to the specific field and its compliance with the basic requirements.
- Reviewer Selection: The journal's editors select appropriate reviewers for the double-blind peer review process. Reviewers are chosen based on their expertise and the content of the article, ensuring they possess the ability to provide independent and unbiased evaluations.
- Anonymous Review Process: In the double-blind peer review process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept hidden. Authors provide their personal information and contact details in a separate file when submitting their articles. This file is kept separate from the content of the article.
- Reviewers' Assessment: Reviewers evaluate the article without knowing the identities of the authors. They express their views on the article's scientific validity, methodology, results, and writing.
- Review Evaluation: The journal's editors assess the reviewers' evaluations, which guide the decision regarding whether the article should be accepted, revised, or rejected.
- Revision Process (Optional): If reviewers have identified areas for revision, authors have the option to make corrections based on these suggestions.
- Acceptance or Rejection Decision: Editors make a decision by considering the reviewers' assessments and the author's revisions if applicable. If the article is accepted, final edits are made, and it is prepared for publication.
The double-blind peer review process is utilized to make the evaluation process fair and scientific. The confidentiality of both authors and reviewers ensures unbiased and equitable assessments.
Our Commitment to Quality
Our journal is committed to delivering high-quality scientific content and upholds the following principles to achieve this goal:
- Author Guidance: We place great importance on the success of our authors. Therefore, we provide guidance on the key considerations authors need to be mindful of while preparing their articles.
- Collaboration: The journal provides an effective online collaboration platform to facilitate communication between our authors and reviewers. This platform enables reviewers to provide their feedback promptly and efficiently.
- Double-Blind Peer Review: We adopt the double-blind peer review process, where both the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential, ensuring the impartiality of the evaluation.
- Feedback Process: The valuable feedback from our reviewers assists us in enhancing the quality of the articles. We offer our authors the opportunity to make corrections and improvements based on this feedback.
- Time Management: We effectively manage the peer review process by establishing specific review timelines and ensuring the process progresses accordingly.
- Continuous Improvement: We regularly review and enhance our journal's peer review processes and operations. This is part of our commitment to improving and increasing the scientific quality of our journal.
These principles reflect our commitment to maintaining and enhancing the scientific quality of our journal. As a journal dedicated to progress and continuous improvement, we are steadfast in adopting the best practices and standards.
Our Journal's Publication Schedule
For the First Issue in December 2023:
- Submission Deadline for Articles: -
- Completion of Peer Reviews: November 25, 2023
- Revisions of Articles Received: December 05, 2023
- Final Article Approval and Edits Completion: December 15, 2023
- Publication of the First Issue: December 25, 2023
For the March 2024 Issue:
- Submission Deadline for Articles: January 31, 2024
- Completion of Peer Reviews: February 15, 2024
- Revisions of Articles Received: March 1-15, 2024
- Final Article Approval and Edits Completion: March 10-24, 2024
- Publication of the March 2024 Issue: March 25, 2024
For the October 2024 Issue:
- Submission Deadline for Articles: August 31, 2024
- Completion of Peer Reviews: September 15, 2024
- Revisions of Articles Received: October 1-15, 2024
- Final Article Approval and Edits Completion: October 10-24, 2024
- Publication of the October 2024 Issue: October 25, 2024